Saturday, March 21, 2015

Improving the reading comprehension competency of the eleventh gade students of MAN Tambakberas Jombang through Jigsaw Strategy

By Endah Ismiati



English language is a mandatory course for senior high school student. It is also one of the test subjects for state-owned higher learning selection examination. To pass the final school test, therefore a student has to master English well. Likewise, if he/she wants to succeed the nationally sanctioned state higher learning selection test, a good command of English is a necessary requirement.  English language mastery requires that a student has to become proficient at reading comprehension skill.  Reading comprehension is most important aspect of language skill acquisition. To measure whether a student proficient or not in English command, reading comprehension skills is the common denominator student’s academic performance. Of the four language skills acquisition, reading comprehension is the most common criteria to evaluate student’s English language mastery. Reading skills therefore, is put at English language teaching top priority.
According to Urquhart and Weir (1998), reading comprehension is the process by which readers use their cognitive abilities to help them understand a written text. These cognitive abilities in reading are composed of two skills, language comprehension and language decoding. A reader needs to use these cognitive abilities to comprehend the meaning of a text and the intent of its author since different reading materials convey different kinds of information. To better reading comprehension skills, readers must possess the background knowledge that is relevant to what they are reading as the reading process involves the prior knowledge that the readers possess, the strategies they use, and the attitude toward reading they have. Additionally, language decoding involve a step in which a reader pronounces the written words correctly and quickly. This step is an important cognitive element for reading comprehension, one that leads the readers to recognize and process a written text. When readers encounter words that are frequently used, they become familiar with them, and word decoding is developed during this process. The ability to decode a written text also involves guessing unfamiliar words from their context (Hirsch, 2003; Wren, 2001).
Comprehension is an ability to get the meaning of something that cannot be observed or measured directly (Rubin, 1993). Comprehension involves thinking, and as there are various levels in the hierarchy of thinking, so are there various levels of comprehension. Higher levels of comprehension would obviously include higher levels of thinking. Smith (1969) explained that comprehension skills involve literal comprehension, interpretation, critical reading, and creative reading. Barrett (1993) has tried to categorize reading comprehension into taxonomy. Barrett’s taxonomy consists of four levels: literal comprehension, inferential comprehension, evaluation, and appreciation.
Hood and Soloman, 1985 states that reading for main idea is a skill that requires carefully reading a text to identify the main point without worrying about unnecessary details . The main idea is the statement made about the topic which is supported by details. Therefore, the main idea is directly related to both the topic and the details in the paragraph. The main idea of a paragraph is the central thought of the paragraph and what the paragraph is about. Without a main idea, the paragraph would just be a confusion of sentences. All the sentences in the paragraph should develop the main idea. To find the main idea of a paragraph, a reader must find what common element the sentences share. Some textbook writers place the main idea at the beginning of a paragraph and may actually put the topic of the paragraph in bold print in order to emphasize it, but in literature this is not a common practice.
Reading for details is a skill that a reader has to get all information of the text thoroughly (Hood and Soloman, 1985). Readers need to be more careful and slower assuring that they have correctly understood the massage. While reading a selection, the first thing students need to do is to find its main idea. The next important thing is to be able to note and recall details. In order to find details that support the main idea, the reader should be able to identify which ideas are more important than the others. The more important details are called “major details”, and we call the supporting details “minor details.”
Cooperative learning is one strategy for group instruction which is under the learner-centered  approach. Many educators give the definitions of cooperative learning:
“Cooperative learning is an instructional program in which students work in small groups to help one another master academic content.” (Slavin, 1995)
“Cooperative learning involves students working together in pairs or groups, and they share information .They are a team whose players must work together in order to achieve goals successfully.” (Brown, 1994)
In addition, Kessler (1992) proposes the definition of cooperative learning particularly in language learning context:
“Cooperative learning is a within-class grouping of students usually of differing levels of second language proficiency, who learn to work together on specific tasks or projects in such a way that all students in the group benefit from the interactive experience.”
According to Johnson (2005), cooperation is not assigning a job to a group of students where one student does all the work and the others put their names on the paper. It is not having students sit side by side at the same table to talk with each other as they do their individual assignments as well. It is not having students do a task individually with instructions that the ones who finish first are to help the slower students. On the contrary, cooperative learning is a teaching strategy in which small teams, each with students of different levels of ability, use a variety of learning activities to improve their under-standing of a subject. Each member of a team is responsible not only for learning what is being taught but also for helping teammates learn, thus creating an atmosphere of achievement. Students work through the assignment until all group members successfully understand and complete it.
The first requirement for an effectively structured cooperative learning environment is that students believe they “sink” or swim together (Johnson, Johnson & Stanne, 2000) That is, cooperation occurs only when students perceive that the success of one depends on the success of the other. Whatever task students are given to perform, each group member must feel that his or her contribution is necessary for the group’s success. Students have to learn to work together in order to accomplish tasks. This is why learning task must be designed in a way that makes them believe, “they sink or swim together.” Through the assigned material, students learn to achieve the goal. Therefore, a number of ways of structuring positive interdependence are carried out such as reward, resources, or task responsibilities to supplement goal interdependence. The second element of cooperative learning requires face-to-face interaction among students within which they promote each other learning and success. Johnson (2005) suggests that it is necessary to maximize the opportunities for them to help, support, encourage, and praise each other. Such encouraging interaction helps to promote the following: a). orally explaining how to solve problems; b). Teaching one’s knowledge to other; c). Checking for understanding; d). Discussing concepts being learned; e). Connecting present with past learning.
The third element is individual accountability. It exists when the performance of each individual student is assessed, and the results are given back to the groups. Therefore, the group knows who needs more assistance, support, and encouragement in completing the job. Johnson & Johnson (1991) suggest some common ways to structure individual accountability. These include giving an individual test to each student, randomly selecting one student to represent the entire group, or having students teach what they have learned to someone else.
Jigsaw technique refers to an activity that allows a small group of students to work together in order to maximize their own and each other learning. The process of activity includes five major steps which are reading, expert-group discussion, team report test, and team recognition (Slavin, 1995). The key to jigsaw is interdependence: every student depends on his or her teammates to provide the information needed to do well on the assessments. In Jigsaw technique, students work in small teams, composed of four or five students who represent a cross-section of the class in terms of academic performance, sex, and race or ethnicity. The team should also have a high performer, a low performer, and two average performers. The students are assigned chapters or other units to read, and are given “expert sheets” that contain different topics for each team member to focus on when reading. When everyone has finished reading, students from different teams with the same topic meet in an “expert group” to discuss their topic for about thirty minutes. The experts then return to their teams and take turns teaching their teammates about their topic. Finally, students take assessments that cover all the topics, and the quiz scores become team scores. Also the scores that students contribute to their teams are based on the individual improvement score system, so students are motivated to study the material well and to work hard in their expert groups so that they can help their team do well.

 






No comments:

Post a Comment