An-Nur
Islamic boarding school of Malang is an educational institution where the
students stay and live together with
dormitory system. In order to
support their learning activities, the students were also taught English as the
medium to explore English proficiency in learning activities within classroom
and communicate each other. Each student was trained to speak English in their
daily communication. Unfortunately, most of the second year students in religious senior high school at An-Nur Islamic
boarding school of Malang did not perform English either in their teaching and
learning activities in classroom or communication with their friends both
inside and outside classroom. It happens because of their speaking ability is
low which is influenced by their problems during teaching and learning process
in classroom. Those problems such as teaching materials that fossilized the
students’ activeness and freedom in speaking by
burdening them with grammatical patterns, English
teaching during learning process seems monotone where teacher teaches the
students with traditional, lack of English vocabularies, lack
of practice, and fear of making mistakes. But, the main problem was there were
not appropriate teaching English speaking materials that give big portion and
opportunity for the students to speak actively and freely in order to support
teaching and learning process of English speaking.
From the facts above, the researcher is interested in
solving those problems and improving the speaking ability of second
year students in religious senior high school at An-Nur Islamic boarding school
of Malang through developing teaching speaking materials based
Communicative Language Teaching approach since speaking is demanded skill in
this globalization era (Ur, 2000).
Communicative
approach in language teaching starts from a theory of language as mean of communication (Littlewood,
2002). Therefore, the goal of English language teaching is to develop
communicative competence. In other words, learning activities in communicative
language teaching should attempt to
replicate real communication. In
this research, the researcher drew a figure of communication continuum
in communicative language teaching activity based on Harmer (1998).
Non-Communicative activities
|
Communicative activities
|
No
communicative desire
|
A
desire to communicate
|
No communicative purpose
|
A
communicative purpose
|
Form
not content
|
Content not form
|
One
language item only
|
Variety of language
|
Teacher intervention
|
No
teacher intervention
|
Materials control
|
Materials control
|
The emphasis in Communicative Language Teaching on the processes of
communication rather than mastery language forms leads to different
roles for learners from those found in more traditional second language classrooms (Patel, 2013).
Students are expected to interact primarily with each other rather than with
the teacher, and correction of errors may be absent or infrequent. The
cooperative (rather than individualistic) approach to learning stressed in CLT
may likewise be unfamiliar to learners (Brown and Yule, 1999). In addition,
student who has good background knowledge, for example, their past learning
experience will more interest to join the lesson (Harmer, 1998).
During learning process,
generally, teacher is being motivator, assessor, facilitator, and corrector
during students’ discussion or speaking in front of the class (Abebe: 2012).
Breen and Candlin in Richard and Rodger (1999, p. 77) also described that the teacher has two main roles: the first
role is to facilitate the communication process between all participants in the
classroom, and between these participants and the various activities and texts.
The second role is to act as an independent participant within the
learning-teaching group. Especially in the more creative types of
activity, unnecessary intervention on the teacher’s part may prevent the
students from becoming genuinely involved in the activity and thus hinder the
development of their communicative skill (Littlewood, 2002). In addition, the teacher also should make
their lesson interesting so the students do not fall asleep during learning
English (Harmer, 1998).
Therefore, developing teaching speaking materials based on Communicative Language Teaching approach
is one of the crucial things in order to make the students in Islamic boarding
school can communicate actively since speaking is the most demanded skill to be
mastered in this globalization era (Kurniawati, 2011). Learning activities with
materials based Communicative Language Teaching focuses on real oral
communication with variety of language and activities without too focus on form
of grammatical patterns if distinguished with non-communicative activities
during learning process of English.
No comments:
Post a Comment